Difference between revisions of "Postfix bounces for nonexistent users"

From Finninday
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Ezekypy (Talk) to last revision by Rday)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
=[http://etizupo.co.cc Page Is Unavailable Due To Site Maintenance, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
 
 
[[Category:Computers]]
 
[[Category:Computers]]
 
[[Category:Postfix]]
 
[[Category:Postfix]]
<pre>
+
<pre>
 
Message: 1
 
Message: 1
 
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:37:13 -0800
 
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:37:13 -0800
From: Wil Cooley &lt;wcooley@nakedape.cc&gt;
+
From: Wil Cooley <wcooley@nakedape.cc>
 
Subject: Re: [PLUG] postfix question:  discarding mail to nonexistent
 
Subject: Re: [PLUG] postfix question:  discarding mail to nonexistent
 
users
 
users
 
To: plug@lists.pdxlinux.org
 
To: plug@lists.pdxlinux.org
Message-ID: &lt;1134754633.24128.13.camel@willow.odshp.com&gt;
+
Message-ID: <1134754633.24128.13.camel@willow.odshp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;us-ascii&quot;
+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
  
 
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:27 -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
 
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:27 -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
  
&gt;&gt; I cannot find a parameter in postfix for turning off bounces for
+
>> I cannot find a parameter in postfix for turning off bounces for
&gt;&gt; non-existent users.  If a spammer sends my server a mail to a
+
>> non-existent users.  If a spammer sends my server a mail to a
&gt;&gt; non-existent user, with a fraudulent return address, postfix  
+
>> non-existent user, with a fraudulent return address, postfix  
&gt;&gt; sends a &quot;no such user&quot; message to the return address.  While this
+
>> sends a "no such user" message to the return address.  While this
&gt;&gt; is probably called for by RFCs, it is not productive behavior  
+
>> is probably called for by RFCs, it is not productive behavior  
&gt;&gt; these days.  Just the mail logs are noting this is occuring are
+
>> these days.  Just the mail logs are noting this is occuring are
&gt;&gt; getting up to 100MB a week.  
+
>> getting up to 100MB a week.  
  
  
Line 29: Line 28:
  
 
Wil
 
Wil
-- Wil Cooley &lt;wcooley@nakedape.cc&gt; Naked Ape Consulting, Ltd
+
-- Wil Cooley <wcooley@nakedape.cc> Naked Ape Consulting, Ltd
&lt;/pre&gt;
+
</pre>

Latest revision as of 05:09, 24 November 2010

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:37:13 -0800
From: Wil Cooley <wcooley@nakedape.cc>
Subject: Re: [PLUG] postfix question:  discarding mail to nonexistent
	users
To: plug@lists.pdxlinux.org
Message-ID: <1134754633.24128.13.camel@willow.odshp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:27 -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:

>> I cannot find a parameter in postfix for turning off bounces for
>> non-existent users.  If a spammer sends my server a mail to a
>> non-existent user, with a fraudulent return address, postfix 
>> sends a "no such user" message to the return address.  While this
>> is probably called for by RFCs, it is not productive behavior 
>> these days.  Just the mail logs are noting this is occuring are
>> getting up to 100MB a week. 


Try 'local_recipient_maps'; this will reject messages for unknown local
recipients during the SMTP session, which is even less overhead than
accepting-and-not-bouncing and without the side-effect of violating
RFCs.

Wil
-- Wil Cooley <wcooley@nakedape.cc> Naked Ape Consulting, Ltd